‘Israel’ is the last ghetto Europeans deported their Jews too. They got them as far from Europe as they could, and all their ‘support’ for ‘Israel’ doesn’t extend to giving the property back they took. No, ‘after’ World War II, the Whites dusted off the Nazi/Zionist Haavara Plan and deported the Jews out of Europe entirely.

This is the most ‘antisemitic’ idea imaginable (go back to where you came from!) but if you complain you get called ‘antisemitic’ now. While the Jews slaughter actual Semitic peoples in front of you. Like everything else in the White Empire, they massacre language and logic first.

But just look at it on a map, if you dare. ‘After’ World War II, were Jews given their land back in Europe? No, they’re not there. Like Frankfurt pushing their Jews across the moat, Europeans pushed their Jews across the Mediterranean by boat. You can see ‘Israel’ at the very edges of the ‘Eurovision’, where Europeans don’t really have to see them (except during that dreadful song competition).

Compare this to a map of Frankfurt in 1458, where you can see the same phenomenon in microcosm. Frederick III pushed the Jews outside the city moat into a narrow Judengasse. Within this ghetto, Jews could govern themselves (just as ‘Israelis’ can now), but they still depended on imperial protection (just as ‘Israel’ does). Jews were eventually given permission to build on the other side of the moat, until they were pushed completely out, across the Mediterranean Sea into ‘Israel’. I put it in quotes because this was not the promised land, Eretz Israel, which only the messiah can command. No, this Ersatz Israel was just another ghetto, a poisoned deal with the White Devils, now reaching its 80-year foreclosure.

You can bring all the Biblical stuff into it, and the fact that Zionist really believe in this ‘Israel’, but Zionism was a fringe belief at the time. It’s only recently that the death cult has corrupted the entire religion. Some Torah Jews still shout about the fact that Palestine was created not by the messiah but by the British incarnation of White Empire, which is as close to Satan as you get. Britain, much more than functionally illiterate ‘America’, specialized in bamboozling the natives using their own mythology.

As the ersatz ‘Israeli’ Yuval Noah Hariri said in his execrable book Sapiens, “The European conquerors knew their empires very well. Far better, indeed, than any previous conquerors, or even than the native population itself.” In his Jewish supremacy, Hariri couldn’t see that ‘Israel’ itself was conquered territory, not by the Jews, but by the Europeans, and used to deport Jews to.

The Jews actually think they’ve joined the White club now, but they haven’t. They’re still in the ghetto, serving as kapos over the real semites, slowly discovering that they lack the final, most vital White privilege, committing a genocide and getting away with it.

‘Israel’ was thus the post war act of pushing European Jews almost completely out of Europe, using the fringe belief of Zionism as a carrot and Hitler as a stick. But Hitler was kindling at this point, Jews could have (and should have) been given their European homes back and reparations, or encouraged to join relatives in ‘America’ at the least. But that didn’t happen. Which tells you what really happened. The Jews were not supported. They were deported instead.

Ghetto Fabulous

This much was obvious to many of the Jewish refugees landing in occupied Palestine. As David Nasby said in The Last Million, “For many of the Jewish displaced persons who immigrated to Israel, the exhilaration of leaving Germany and arriving in their new homes was followed rather quickly by disappointment, approaching desperation. They had miraculously survived one war in Europe. They were now entering another war zone.”

This ghettoization seems less obvious now that ‘Israel’ is relatively rich, but they’re just ghetto fabulous. The constant shooting has never stopped, and Jews are increasingly ostracized from the White spaces they crave inclusion in. In sports, music, and commerce they face increasing boycotts and open derision. Not because of ‘antisemitism’, but because of what they’ve actually done to actual Semites. ‘Israel’ is thus an increasingly distant ghetto to Europe and an absolutely hated (albeit rich) ghetto wedged into West Asia.

It also seems less obvious that ‘Israel’ is a ghetto if you see all the rich Jews, but ghettos have rich people too! These are in fact the most conspicious rich people, which can skew your view. The Jewish ghettos in Europe always had rich, ‘court’ Jews, many of whom rose to great power under various White princes. However, the bulk of Jews then, as now, were wedged into ghettos while a few rich Jews gallivanted around, indulging in corruption that eventually brought it all down. History rhyming, can you not hear the sound?

Like in other ghettos, many Jews moving, primarily, outside ‘Israel’ have risen to great power, but ask Chinese eunuchs how such proximity to princes goes. You’re still not whole. Again, Jews are testing if they have the ultimate White privilege—committing genocide and getting away with it—and they don’t. ‘Israel’ is not a place of their own, it has no power to stand on its own. It’s just another ghetto.

I’ll return to history in a way that might be repetitive, but history repeats, deal with it. I repeat the historical fact that European Jews did not get their European homes back after World War II. They were kicked out to clear the way for American/Nazi collaboration. As survivor Samuel Gringauz explained in Commentary (1948, via The Last Million), “Germany is to be transformed from a defeated enemy into the guardian of our European front line. The Jewish survivors in the occupied zone of Western Germany are an obstacle to this development.”

The other historical fact is that World War II was never about the Holocaust (which killed more Slavs and communists, but nevermind that, as the White history does). ‘America’ pushed boats of Jews back into the concentration camps and did not want to take in Jews after the war either. As American Senator James Eastland said (ibid), “We are getting away from American ideals when we admit to this country from eastern Europe people with an Oriental philosophy, a philosophy not compatible with that of the people of the United States.” This is literally the same logic that Hitler had for exterminating the Jews (his main enemy was communism), taken to a penultimate solution that the Nazis were also cool with. Deportation out of Europe.

‘Israel’ is the very racist idea that Jews should ‘go back to where they came from’. This was an idea that then fringe Zionists collaborated with Nazis on, in the Haavara Plan, as mentioned. Zionists were pulled from the fringes in order to singe an entire region and smoke the oil, or at least the spoils, out. And what happened to the Jews, in the main? They were moved from the concentration camp of the Nazis that lost to a conscript colony for the Nazis that won. If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em, I guess.

Zionists collaborated with Whites that still hated the Jews and this wacky, self-reinforcing, self-deporting Jewish extremism has become mainstream now, corrupting the whole crew. Judaism is a rare religion that went from a cult to a religion and back to a cult again. Now most Jews think they’re going to hurry God and bring the end times on, when God will roast the Christians. Meanwhile Christian Zionists think God will roast the Jews instead. It’s a really perverse alliance, where each side actually wants the other dead. That’s the eschatology of the matter, but historically, it’s not that complicated.

The Messiah obviously isn’t here yet, and if they were, they’d be horrified at what the Jews are doing right before judgment day, when you should be on your best behavior. If you look at the mess they’ve made, here, it’s clear that ‘Israel’ is just a ghetto to keep Jews away from White people that didn’t like them, and at the throats of Muslims the White Empire likes even less. This obviously wasn’t a deal with the Messiah but the Great Satan.

All the Jews have done—and I say Jews because they’re completely corrupted now—is become the worst version of themselves in the European imagination, which is just normal Europeans to everybody under colonization. They thought they’d get acceptance from White people from this, but instead they get only condemnation, for doing the same stuff Australians and Canadians did, just in the wrong century, and without enough time to get away with it. Thus the Jews find themselves in the same situation as time immemorial, a few of them collaborating with fickle princes and living royal, while the bulk are stuck in a ghetto near the oil. In this way, the Jews are screwed. They might be ghetto fabulous, but they’re still ghetto.

Jacob & Esau (Rothschild & Balfour)

Another clue as to the ghetto status of ‘Israel’ is in its founding document. I used to wonder about the Balfour Declaration. Why was the creation of ‘Israel’ declared by Britain (which didn’t own Palestine) to Lord Rothschild (who was just a private citizen)? In ghettonomics, however, this makes sense. Rothschild was, in fact, receiving the deed for a new ghetto, evidenced by the fact that he never moved to ‘Israel’ himself.

In Europe, court Jews like the Rothschilds mediated (often mendaciously) between the court and the ghetto. The court Jews got some concessions for their people, while their people took the blame for the rich Jews’ evil. The Rothschild’s personal history is instructive here, and we can get it from a book they co-sponsored, From Court Jews to the Rothschilds. That book describes 1807, saying, “Salomon Rothschild came to feel the impact of the provisions of the new Stättigkeit, as the town council forbade him to rent an apartment for himself and his wife outside the ghetto.” As you can see, even the Rothschilds were once stuck in the Frankfurt ghetto themselves. But not since.

The European Rothschilds had a ‘meteoric rise’ and then, from the outside, never stopped “using their influence to act as champions for the Emancipation of the Jews in those countries in which they themselves lived.” But you can see the problem with Lord (Lionel Walter) Rothschild little deal here, because he himself lived and died in England. So what exactly was he championing in ‘Israel’? It wasn’t a ‘country in which he himself lived.’ The Rothchilds remained, almost to a man (minus Bethsabée de Rothschild) in Europe or America. So what had Lord Rothschild won? Just a further deportation of the Jews, from across the moat of Frankfurt to across the entire Mediterranean. Where he did not follow them.

Today the surviving French and British branches of the Rothschilds live, primarily, inside the core White Empire, not the ‘Israeli’ ghetto on its fringes. They are ‘the known benefactors’ of ‘Israel’ but they don’t stay there, because ‘Israel’ is a ghetto and the Rothschilds are rich Jews, in that order. What Lord Rothschild, fencing stolen goods, accomplished was not “the Emancipation of the Jews in those countries in which they themselves lived,” but ghettoization somewhere new, disguised as somewhere old for fundamentalist rubes.

This is an age-old story, elite Jews serving European princes as courtiers (corrupting them quite consensually) while the Jewish masses live in a ghetto themselves (bearing the consequences). Jewish rabbis likened the relationship (between Jews and Christians) to that between the biblical Jacob & Esau. As the book of the same name by Malachi Haim Hacohen tells the tale,

With the help of his mother, Rebecca, he deceived his father, Isaac, by wearing Esau’s clothes and received the firstborn’s blessing. A furious Esau conspired to kill him, and Jacob escaped abroad, returning, after two decades, wealthy and mature, and with a large family. He feared that Esau would still seek revenge and decimate his family, but when they met, they fell on each other’s shoulders and cried. The Genesis story ends in reconciliation.

This story intersects with Christianity in the sayings, “the elder shall serve the younger” (Genesis 25:23). [And that] “The older people of the Jews,” said Augustine,“was destined to serve the younger people, the Christians,” (ibid). The point is that this a tale as old as time, this abusive relationship between Europeans and Jews. And the story doesn’t end in reconcilation like the Biblical version, but repetition.

Jews are constantly ‘dressing up’ as White men, getting chased out, taken back because (some of them) are prosperous, and then starting the cycle all over again. This has happened all over the fake continent of Europe and now it happens globally via the fake country of ‘Israel’.

The bulk of Jews are isolated in ‘Israel’, in constant danger, while their elites move across the imperial courts, doing well. In this way, some Jews can rise to great power but they do not have power. ‘Israel’ is not their country, won by their own arms and held by their own diplomatic charms (lol). No, ‘Israel’ is ghetto of the White Empire, protected from the furious masses surrounding them by imperial force, only sold to imperial dumbasses through massive propaganda and now censorship, and only held in place by imperial diktat, overriding all ‘international’ institutions.

People say Jews run the Empire, and it certainly looks like it, but war is the art of deception, as Master Sun said, and this is an old trick. Again, ask the Chinese Eunuchs or any class placed in front of the emperor to take the heat. The very fact that we see Jews out in front of every evil and horrific imperial decision protects the Whites (just soulless stand-ins for Capital) equally in on it. This is an old European trick, such that when Selma Stern describes it historically (in The Court Jew) she’s really describing the current predicament. Stern said,

The masses knew little about the intrigues, hatreds, setbacks and discouragements to which the war contractor was subjected. They saw only despised Jews, who only a short time before had been expelled from the country, now returning as distinguished gentlemen, speaking the language of the country, wearing the clothes of the time, dealing with ministers, politicians and generals, living in beautiful homes in which they imagined there must be fabulous treasures. They themselves were burdened with heavy taxes and duties, their business had declined to the vanishing point, their fields lay waste, their houses had been destroyed by the weapons of the enemy, their soldiers suffered hunger and cold, went without uniforms and were seldom paid.

Can you not see it happening this way? The dumbasses in the imperial core know little about the intrigues involving a disproportionate amount of Jews, but also a bunch of White people as well, as well as ‘colored’ people applying whitening cream. All they see is their costs going up, their businesses shuttering, and the soldiers eating shoe leather, dying for their Jew betters. Meanwhile they see Jews crying wolf on the news about ‘antisemitism’, openly calling for genocide and the right to rape in ‘Israel’, and openly committing every atrocity they were every accused of, like corrupting governments and raping children. It’s not a conspiracy theory if it’s in front of you and proven, is it?

Jews are just a part of the problem (the whole White Empire is rotten), but they’re a big part of the problem, and now the most prominent. This is not, historically, a good place for Jews to be, in between corrupt princes and angry masses as the visible face of corruption. But those that don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and so here we go again, with the ghetto a flight away from Europe instead of walking distance.

The Jewish Problems

Do you want to read more? This is long enough already, but if you want a few more sources and a bit more discourses, please pay me. I am just an Internet beggar, with hat at the ready.

In March 2016, a Stanley, New Mexico rancher named William sat down and wrote a straightforward technical memo. He had been asked by Brice Gordon, ranch manager at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, to evaluate options for a new internet connection at the property. William knew the area, knew the terrain, and knew exactly what was available.

He laid out three options.

Plan A was ideal: tap into the Singleton Ranch’s existing fiber feed site, just a short distance away with gigabit fiber available and a clear radio shot. The Singleton negotiation was already underway. William had been in contact with Vito, the Singleton manager, who had briefed the family. CenturyLink contacts had confirmed gigabit availability in the Galisteo area. This was a clean, fast, affordable solution — estimated between $75,000 and $150,000 to build, with monthly service costs that were entirely manageable.

Plan B was a solid fallback: find any nearby property with CenturyLink gigabit fiber access, lease it, and build a short microwave hop. William had done exactly this on his own ranch. He called it the best alternative.

Plan C was Sandia Crest — the 10,620-foot peak visible from Albuquerque, 27 miles away. William was direct about it. “Difficulty of access, expense, and such a large distance makes it less than ideal for a point to point radio shot,” he wrote. It would require “incredibly expensive industrial/military grade equipment.” Signal throughput would be no better than 30%.

Within 48 hours of receiving William’s report, Jeffrey Epstein had made his choice.

He chose Plan C.

The documents recording that choice — and everything that followed — are sitting in the DOJ’s publicly available Epstein file archive. They have been there since the files were released. Almost no one has read them. What they reveal is not merely a connectivity decision. It is the operational signature of an intelligence asset building covert communications infrastructure, surrounded by the men who built him, protected by the institutions that owned him, and connected — literally, through a satellite uplink with direct-to-orbit authorization — to wherever his handlers needed the data to go.

“We Don’t Need 1g”

The email thread begins on March 22, 2016, when Brice Gordon forwarded William’s report to Epstein at jeevacation@gmail.com, copying Richard Kahn of HBRK Associates at 575 Lexington Avenue in New York. Kahn was not a ranch facilities manager. He was Epstein’s New York-based project coordinator, and his involvement in a rural New Mexico internet installation tells you everything about what this project actually was.

Epstein’s response arrived the following morning in two messages. At 7:04 AM: “we do not need a gigabit k itsl sllly.” The garbled characters are typos — he meant “it’s silly.” At 7:56 AM, a second message: “we shoot dragon wave further, makes little sense.”

DragonWave is not consumer equipment. It is carrier-grade, military-specification microwave backhaul hardware used by telecom operators and government networks. Its defining property is hardware-level AES encryption built into the radio layer — below the IP stack, invisible to standard network monitoring — combined with hardware-bound authentication that makes interception effectively impossible. Epstein was not asking about DragonWave because he had looked it up. He was referencing existing DragonWave infrastructure he already had — at Little St. James, his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. He was asking why the same architecture couldn’t simply be extended to New Mexico. And he was doing it at the moment he was moving his entire center of operations from the island to the ranch, coincident with the Southern District of New York and the Miami Herald both digging into his child sex trafficking operation. Epstein guesses, correctly, that New Mexico would never subject him to such scrutiny.

On March 25, Epstein told Gordon that if technical difficulties arose, they should bring in “the lsj guy” — Hector Cintron, who worked for Choice Communications in the U.S. Virgin Islands at hcintron@choice.vi. Cintron appears directly in the project correspondence that followed. The island infrastructure and the New Mexico infrastructure were being designed and managed as one unified system.

A man who wants high-speed internet for a vacation ranch does not call gigabit bandwidth silly. A man who wants a specific, narrow, encrypted channel for transmitting particular data to a particular destination does.

This was not, as some people have said in comments on the previous two Epstein-Zorro-Radio-Towers stories I’ve done, “rich guy internet.”

Epstein dismissed bandwidth twice because bandwidth was never the point.

Spying was.

The Company That Built It

The company selected to design and build the Zorro Ranch to Sandia Crest system was Future Technologies Venture, LLC, headquartered in Suwanee, Georgia. As with the architects and the builders of the ranch’s main house, they are primarily military industrial contractors, and among their largest clients is the pentagon. As I said before when writing about the architect and builder, I will say again now about Future Technologies Venture, LLC: If Epstein were merely a rich eccentric creep raping kids on video for fun, he would not likely have run the operation through major proxies for the United States government.

The lead contact at Future Technologies Venture was Chris Cappiello, then Director of Business Development, now Chief Revenue Officer. Between April and May of 2016, Cappiello personally ran the link budget calculations, verified the Sandia Crest tower coordinates, designed the 11GHz HAAM system, and coordinated with Hector Cintron at Little St. James and with Richard Kahn throughout the buildout. His brother Peter Cappiello is CEO, based in the New York City metropolitan area.

The April 15, 2016 engineering calculation preserved in the DOJ archive is precise: Sandia Crest tower to ZDC Main tower, 26.8 miles, 99.997% reliability at 227 Mbps. ZDC Main tower to Main Residence, 2.17 miles, 99.999% reliability at 297 Mbps. Cappiello also flagged a direct option: Sandia Crest tower to Main Residence, bypassing the intermediate tower entirely, at 27.53 miles. Epstein chose the direct link.

Future Technologies’ connection to the Epstein operation predated Zorro Ranch. Between 2009 and 2010, the company had built DragonWave microwave backhaul infrastructure across the U.S. Virgin Islands for Choice Communications — Hector Cintron’s employer. When Zorro Ranch needed the same architecture, both Cintron and Future Technologies were the natural call. This was not a new vendor relationship. It was an existing network being extended.

The company describes itself as a specialist in “mission-critical connectivity infrastructure” for “extremely remote outdoor sites” and government environments. “Critical Connectivity. Built Right.” reads the banner on their LinkedIn page. In December 2025, Future Technologies announced it had been selected for the Missile Defense Agency’s SHIELD IDIQ contract — the Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layered Defense program, a multiple-award vehicle with a $151 billion ceiling covering next-generation missile defense systems under the Golden Dome initiative. Chris Cappiello, the man who designed Epstein’s encrypted link to Sandia Crest, now oversees Future Technologies’ Federal sales segment.

The Signal Mirror

On May 21, 2016, Future Technologies conducted a physical site visit at Zorro Ranch. The findings were forwarded to Richard Kahn, who relayed them to Epstein on May 23.

Line of sight from Sandia Crest to the main house had been confirmed by flashing a signal mirror toward the peak. Conditions were too hazy for any other method.

The dish on the Sandia tower was to be placed at 72 feet. The main house dish was to be set at approximately 30 feet — requiring either a new pole or an extension of the existing one. The report flagged that at 30 feet, the pole “will extend past the apex of the mechanical building roof and will be visible from the back parking area.” This, the report stated, “will need to be brought to Jeffrey’s attention.”

Epstein was personally managing the visual concealment of a satellite dish installation at his New Mexico ranch. Future Technologies was instructed to contact Sierra Nevada Property Management directly to coordinate installation on the Sandia Crest tower — the tower controlled by Dennis Vanderhoof, whose FCC licenses THE PUGILIST has previously reported.

To Orbit

Those licenses matter because of what they authorized.

TeleBEEPER of New Mexico, Inc., headquartered at 4545 McLeod NE in Albuquerque, held satellite earth station license E940533 with direct-to-orbit uplink capability. In November 2011, TeleBEEPER filed with the FCC’s International Bureau — file number SES-STA-20111130-01406 — for Special Temporary Authority to extend that license pending permanent authority. The FCC granted the extension on December 6, 2011. The uplink capability was being actively maintained and renewed approximately four years before the Zorro Ranch buildout began.

The system build this creates is not a ranch internet connection. Data transmitted from the Zorro Ranch main house travels 27.53 miles by encrypted military-grade microwave to the Sandia Crest tower. From there it reaches Vanderhoof’s satellite earth station. From there it goes to orbit. From orbit it can reach anywhere on the planet, untraceable to Zorro Ranch.

William, the local rancher who wrote the original memo, described Sandia Crest as yielding “30% of the bandwidth thru.” That was precisely the point. Epstein was not moving large files. He was not streaming video. He was transmitting something specific, something narrow, something that required hardware-level encryption below the IP stack and a pathway to orbit. He called gigabit bandwidth silly because he didn’t need gigabit bandwidth. He needed something that couldn’t be found.

The Men Who Built Him

William, the Stanley rancher who wrote the technical memo, is Bill Patterson. His phone number — 505-832-6236 — appears in both the Patterson Ranch Airport FAA registry and the business listing for Komtek Communications, located at 3762 NM-41 in Stanley, New Mexico. Komtek Communications was incorporated in New Mexico in 1977, revived in 1993 — the year Epstein purchased Zorro Ranch — and permanently shuttered in 2001, when Epstein’s legal exposure began. Patterson Ranch Airport was permanently closed with the FAA in September 2008, the same year Epstein’s federal prosecution concluded. Survivors of Epstein’s child sex trafficking ring have reported being flown into a nearby neighboring ranch. Epstein’s Zorro Ranch had a runway, but it was grass. Patterson’s runway was paved, and flight records over the years show the most traffic coming and going from White Sands Missile Range, where the first atomic bomb was detonated and where the United States military has continuously tested weapons ever since.

The name Komtek bears a striking resemblance to Commtouch, the Israeli email infrastructure company co-founded by Isabel Maxwell — daughter of Robert Maxwell, sister of Ghislaine — a company with documented ties to Israeli Unit 8200 intelligence alumni. Whether that naming parallel is coincidence, homage, or signal is a question this reporter cannot yet answer. What is not in question is that Bill Patterson, operator of a communications company whose corporate timeline mirrors Epstein’s New Mexico presence precisely, was the man who laid out the three options and watched Epstein choose the covert one. Also noteworthy, a small dirt road near Zorro Ranch is named Komradt.

The only things that show up today when you search for Zorro Ranch on Google Maps are these — “Young Place” on the San Cristobal Ranch, today owned by the heirs of OSS officer and Teledyne founder Henry Singleton; “Hidden Art,” a public art piece hidden in an abandoned gas station in the middle of nowhere by artist Robert Harkness, who died shortly after making it; “Patterson Ranch Airport” on William “Bill” Patterson’s Ranch; and his company, “Komtek Communications” — which means someone secretly geotagged them as a breadcrumb trail. (I had to add the Zorro Ranch location myself.)

The Singleton Ranch (San Cristobal Ranch) was Plan A. Henry Singleton, who died in 1999, founded Teledyne — one of the most significant defense electronics conglomerates in American history, whose subsidiaries included the largest producer of military reconnaissance drones, missile guidance systems, and classified NASA and Defense Department engineering programs. He built his ranching empire in the Galisteo Basin beginning in the 1970s. He and his son Will appears in Epstein’s black book. Epstein had the modem number for Singelton’s San Cristobal Ranch in the book, too. Singleton’s ranch manager Vito was in active negotiation to provide Epstein with access to the ideal communications relay point. Singleton served in the Office of Strategic Services — the OSS, predecessor to the CIA — in Europe in 1944 and 1945.

Donald Barr also served in the OSS, at headquarters in Washington, D.C., during the same final year of the war. After the war, Barr became headmaster of the Dalton School in New York. In 1973 — the same year he published Space Relations, a science fiction novel about oligarchs who traffic children on a distant planet — he hired a young Jeffrey Epstein, who had no college degree, to teach mathematics. Investigative reporter Kait Justice has reported that Barr likely identified and began cultivating Epstein for intelligence recruitment years earlier, possibly when Epstein was as young as ten years old. Donald Barr is the father of William Barr, who served as Attorney General of the United States during Epstein’s 2019 arrest, incarceration, and death in federal custody.

Two OSS veterans. One recruited Epstein as a child and installed him in elite institutions. The other owned the ranch next door and employed the man whose fiber site was Epstein’s first choice for his covert communications relay.

Neither connection has been seriously investigated by any official body.

I am guessing none ever will, because at the bottom of it is the entire reason the full Epstein files have never been released.

What This Is

The standard framing of Jeffrey Epstein as a Mossad asset is well-supported. Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s father, sold Israeli-backdoored PROMIS software to Sandia National Laboratories in 1985. His eldest daughter, Christine Maxwell, built the FBI’s post-9/11 counterterrorism data warehouse through her company Chiliad. Isabel Maxwell, Christine’s twin sister, co-founded Commtouch with Israeli Unit 8200 alumni. Ghislaine ran the human intelligence operation. The Israeli intelligence network around both Maxwell and Epstein is documented and substantial.

But the intelligence infrastructure supporting Epstein (and Maxwell) at Zorro Ranch points somewhere else, or somewhere additional. It points the United States military intelligence, plain and simple. The contractor who built his encrypted link to orbit is American, headquartered in Georgia, and now holds a Missile Defense Agency contract. The satellite uplink was authorized by an American FCC license. The project was managed out of a New York office. The man who recruited Epstein as a child served in the American OSS, and his own son was in charge of the federal justice department when Epstein died (or didn’t?) in its custody. The man whose ranch provided the ideal relay point was OSS, built American missile guidance systems and military drones. And just up the road, another former OSS guy, Karl Ingwer, sold his New Mexico ranch to the strangest duo of all time: Donald Rumsfeld and Dan Rather.

Intelligence operations of this type — long-running, multigenerational, protected across multiple administrations by the children of the men who built them — do not belong to one agency or one country. They belong to the network. The network has Israeli components and American components and private-sector components, all of them running simultaneously, all of them providing institutional protection to each other because exposure of any one thread risks unraveling the rest. And in its middle and later years, the same network had Soviet/Russian components.

Jeffrey Epstein was not a financier who stumbled into intelligence work. He was an asset identified in childhood by an OSS veteran, cultivated through elite institutional access, funded through the Mega Group (private capital in the United States in support of Israel), equipped with Israeli surveillance infrastructure, given American defense-contractor communications architecture, embedded between a CIA-lineage defense titan’s ranch on a ranch sold to him by the then sitting governor of New Mexico, and protected unto death by the son of the man who first found him.

The files were always public. The documents were always there. The story was always visible to anyone who looked.

But those who would cover up the most damning truth have been banking on Americans focusing only on the horrific stories of the abuse that happened under Epstein’s watch. They’ve counted on Americans blaming only two people, two individuals — Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — and leaving it at that. The powers that be have enacted a massive narrative control project, using their own assets and helpers in the media and government, to convince us all that there’s nothing to see here expect a couple of rich, depraved individuals and their handful of similar friends, who hurt kids and now must pay. They have kept the network and who it served completely out of the story. And for the most part, they’ve been successful.

Until now.

Please note: The FCC licenses for the industrial/military grade microwave radio network Epstein built are still active, and the system is still up and running under the ranch’s new ownership. The owners are Mary Catherine and Donald Huffines. Donald Huffines is currently running to be state comptroller of Texas. He is endorsed by Donald Trump. Mary Catherine and Donald Huffines secretly met with top Russian official in 2018, to help Rand Paul hand-deliver a letter to Vladimir Putin from Trump, and to negotiate for the release from US custody of Maria Butina, a Russian spy. If Donald Huffines wins the comptroller’s race, he will be in control of the 8th-largest economy in the world. Texas’ economy is larger than Russia’s. And just a few steps from the entrance to “San Rafael” Ranch (formerly Zorro Ranch) in New Mexico, “Komradt” road leads to the ranch still owned by the family of Bruce King, the governor who sold Zorro to Epstein

.

THE PUGILIST accepts no advertising and is funded entirely by readers. If this work matters to you, please share it.

Tip Jar

Share

Subscribe now

Source documents: DOJ Epstein file archive, EFTA00831005-6, EFTA00830845-8, EFTA00702637-644, EFTA_R1_00025477-25482. FCC International Bureau filing SES-STA-20111130-01406. GlobeNewswire, Future Technologies Venture LLC, December 23, 2025. Kait Justice, investigative reporting on Donald Barr and Epstein recruitment.

Infinite Jaz exists because I believe reporting on Israel-Palestine, and the systems of power that shape it, should not be filtered through the priorities of billionaires and politically biased, risk-averse institutions.

But all of my reporting is self-funded, and it cannot continue without your support. If you believe in the importance of independent journalism, please consider becoming a paid subscriber—you’ll gain access to the full archive of subscriber-only reporting and help cover my upcoming reporting trips to the West Bank.

Subscribe now

Get 20% off for 1 year

Nick Kristof, the veteran New York Times opinion columnist who has covered sexual violence in conflict zones for decades, published an extraordinary piece on Monday, The Silence That Meets the Rape of Palestinians, in which he reports out the UN’s claim that Israeli leaders “have built a security apparatus where sexual violence has become one of Israel’s ‘standard operating procedures.’”

For my purposes here, I’m going to set aside the fact that Kristof felt compelled to open with two paragraphs of throat-clearing—both-sidesing the horrific testimonials of what’s being done to Palestinians right now against the alleged sexual assaults by Hamas on October 7, 2023, many of whose details have since unraveled under scrutiny.

Below, I’m going to quote from the piece at some length to give you a sense of the graphic sexual violence Kristof reported. Please consider this to be a major trigger warning. (If you’ve already read the Kristof piece, you can skip down to the next section beginning with “Predictably.”)

Here’s an account from Sami al-Sai, a 46-year-old freelance journalist arrested in 2024:

“They were all hitting me, and one stepped on my head and neck,” he said. “Someone pulled my pants down. They pulled down my boxers.” And then one of the guards pulled out a rubber baton used to beat prisoners.

“They were trying to force it into my rectum, and I was bracing myself to prevent it, but I couldn’t. It was so painful.” The guards were laughing at him, he said. “Then I heard someone say, ‘Give me the carrots,’” he recalled, adding that they then used a carrot. “It was extremely painful,” he said. “I was praying for death.”

…One of the guards was a woman who, he said, grabbed him by the penis and testicles, and joked, “these are mine,” and then squeezed until he screamed from pain…

After he was dumped into his cell, he concluded that the spot where he had been raped had been used before, for he found other people’s vomit, blood and broken teeth crushed into his skin.

From a Euro-Med report, which says “Israeli forces systematically employ rape and sexual torture to humiliate Palestinian female detainees”:

It cited a 42-year-old woman who said she had been shackled naked to a metal table as Israeli soldiers forcibly had sex with her over two days while other soldiers filmed the attacks. Afterward, she said, she was shown photos of her being raped and told they would be published if she did not cooperate with Israeli intelligence…

Hand-held metal detectors were used to probe between men’s naked legs and then smashed into their private parts; some men had to have their testicles amputated by doctors after beatings, according to the Euro-Med monitor.

On sexual violence against children:

Save the Children commissioned a survey last year of children ages 12 to 17 who had been in Israeli detention; more than half reported witnessing or experiencing sexual violence. Save the Children said that the true figure was probably higher because stigma left some unwilling to acknowledge what had happened to them…

I located and interviewed three boys who had been detained, and all described being sexually abused.

One, a shy boy in a Hilfiger shirt who was 15 years old at the time of his arrest, declined to say whether he had also witnessed actual rapes. But he said threats were routine: “They’d say, ‘Do this or we’ll put this stick up your butt.’”

The other boys told very similar stories of sexual violence as part of beatings and noted that the threats of rape were directed not only at them but also at their mothers and siblings.

On the threats that follow:

A half-dozen guards immobilized him by holding his arms and legs while pulling down his pants and underwear and inserting a metal baton into his anus. The rapists were laughing and cheering, he said.

Several hours later, he said, he fainted and was taken to the prison clinic. After he woke up, he said, he was raped once more, again with the metal baton.

“I was bleeding,” he recalled. “I broke down completely. I was crying.”

After being returned to his cell, he said, he asked a guard for pen and paper to write a complaint about the assaults. The request was denied. And that evening, a group of guards came to the cell.

“Who is the one who wants to file a complaint?” one guard jeered, he said, and another guard pointed him out. “The beating started immediately,” he recalled. And then they raped him with the baton for a third time that day, he said.

He recalled one saying, “Now you have even more to put in your complaint.”

A few days after I interviewed him, the farmer called to say that he didn’t want his name used after all. He had just been visited by Shin Bet and warned not to cause trouble.

On the 2024 leaked video showing nine guards sodomizing a shackled prisoner, which led to riots in support of the rapists:

One Palestinian prisoner from Gaza reportedly was hospitalized in July 2024 with a tear in his rectum, cracked ribs and a punctured lung. Investigators obtained a prison video purportedly showing the abuse. The authorities detained nine reservist soldiers — but Israel’s right-wingers erupted in outrage, with a mob of furious protesters, including politicians, breaking into the prison to show support for the guards. The last charges against the soldiers were dropped in March, and last month the military approved the soldiers’ return to duty.

Netanyahu hailed the dropping of charges as the end of a “blood libel.” “The State of Israel must hunt down its enemies — not its heroic fighters,” he said…

That prisoner, who afterward reportedly required a stoma bag to collect his waste, was returned to Gaza, and an acquaintance of his said that he spent months in a hospital recovering from his internal injuries.

On the use of dogs:

On one occasion, he said, the guards zip-tied his testicles and penis for hours while beating his genitals. For days afterward, he said, he urinated blood.

On one occasion, he said, he was held down, stripped naked, and as he was blindfolded and handcuffed, a dog was summoned. With encouragement from a handler in Hebrew, he said, the dog mounted him.

“They were using cameras to take photos, and I heard their laughs and giggles,” he said. He tried to dislodge the dog, he said, but it penetrated him.

On sexual violence by settlers against Palestinians:

Israeli settlers are not an official arm of the state in the same way that the prison system is, but the Israel Defense Forces increasingly protect settlers as they attack Palestinian villagers and use sexual violence to drive Palestinians to flee. “Sexualized violence is used to pressure communities” to leave their land…

The consortium surveyed Palestinian farmers and found that more than 70 percent of households that had been displaced reported that threats to women and children, particularly of sexual violence, were the decisive reason for leaving. “Sexual violence,” said Allegra Pacheco of the coalition, “is one of the mechanisms driving people from their land.”

In a remote Jordan Valley hamlet of Bedouin farmers, I met a 29-year-old farmer, Suhaib Abualkebash, who recounted how a gang of about 20 settlers rampaged through the homes of his family, beating adults and children alike, stealing jewelry and 400 sheep — and also cut off his clothes with a hunting knife and then tightly zip-tied his penis and yanked.

“I was afraid they would cut off my penis,” Abualkebash told me. “I thought this was the end for me.”

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert weighs in:

To try to make sense of what I found, I called up Ehud Olmert, who was prime minister from 2006 to 2009. Olmert told me he didn’t know much about sexual violence against Palestinians but was not surprised by the accounts I had heard.

“Do I believe it happens?” he asked. “Definitely.”

On Israel’s response:

Israel welcomed a United Nations report documenting sexual assaults against Israeli women by Palestinians but rejected the report’s call to investigate Israeli assaults against Palestinians.

Predictably, after the piece was published, Israel and its defenders lined up to accuse the Times of printing lies, blood libel, and—you guessed it—Hamas propaganda.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry asserted that the prison guards filmed sodomizing a shackled Palestinian are the real victims here:

The WSJ op-ed below was written by the head of “Honest Reporting,” an Israeli propaganda outlet masquerading as a media watchdog that has published, among other things, numerous denials of famine in Gaza.

Bari Weiss, who recently allowed Netanyahu to pick his own 60 Minutes interviewer, wasn’t going to sit this one out. In addition to the article below, Weiss’s Free Press published a piece on the mechanics of dog rape.

As it turns out, all of the sources are “anti-Israel” on account of being raped by Israelis:

Here’s a remarkable thing to say about any army, let alone one occupying a people for far longer than this man has been alive:

Some pioneering rape-deniers even took to review-bombing “Kristof Farms”:

So, yes, the usual hasbarists and right-wing zealots were out in force—but I was particularly interested in the reactions of many so-called liberal Zionists.

Like Hen Mazzig, a hipster-coded Senior Fellow at The Tel Aviv Institute who has become ubiquitous online for fiercely defending Israel—and, more recently, for calling on the Israeli government to crack down on the radical settlers while conveniently omitting the fact of their open alliance:

This week, Mazzig suddenly became a media expert, firing off multiple tweets and Substack posts accusing Kristof of shoddy reporting.

Here he is suggesting that Kristof’s father, who died over fifteen years ago, may have been some sort of Nazi who influenced the article from the grave. Maybe you can decode the allegation, but I certainly couldn’t:

In fairness, this is far from Mazzig’s first foray into conspiracy theory—in October 2023, he asserted that a photo of a dead Palestinian baby was actually a “Pallywood doll.”

And then there’s Deborah Lipstadt, President Biden’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, who amplified a call for Nick Kristof to be executed:

What’s interesting about Mazzig, Lipstadt, and their peers is that they’ve built their reputations as liberal Zionists in part by being willing to denounce Israel’s far-right extremists. Controlled opposition, if you will. In these circles, it’s become fashionable to condemn, in particular, the cartoonishly evil National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, framing him as a fringe figure who doesn’t represent Israel.

Here is Mazzig saying it is his “ultimate fantasy” to see Ben-Gvir removed from office:

In 2019, Lipstadt publicly cut ties with her synagogue after it supported Netanyahu’s alliance with Ben-Gvir’s far-right political party, Otzma Yehudit:

The article reports:

“This is a party that has racist views,” [Lipstadt] said. “This is a party that condones murder. This is a party that condones the man who committed the largest mass murder in Israel by a Jew. Those are all things that I find despicable, and to say it’s just politics is really bad.”

All this leaves me wondering: What exactly do Hen Mazzig, Deborah Lipstadt, and their liberal Zionist friends think Ben-Gvir has been up to during his tenure as National Security Minister—a role that, among other things, has him overseeing the Israel Prison Service?

Did they think his noose lapel pin was just a fashion statement?

That he popped champagne after the passage of the apartheid death penalty law as a gag?

That he had a portrait of Baruch Goldstein, who massacred 29 Muslim worshippers in 1994, hanging on his wall because he thought it tied the room together?

Do they think he’s joking when he boasts about starving Palestinian prisoners—“They come in fat and leave thin”—or when he proudly rebuffed the Israeli Supreme Court’s ruling that the state was failing to provide enough nutrition to ensure even “a basic level of existence” and had to remedy it?

Are they actually surprised that the minister who celebrated his birthday with a noose-themed cake oversees a prison regime of torture and humiliation targeting the people he is desperately trying to execute?

In short, I find it rather bizarre that many liberal Zionists will concede that Ben-Gvir is evil, yet react with complete outrage and incredulity the moment the evil he has brought to bear is exposed.

The only way to hold these contradictory beliefs is to remain in complete denial about the extent to which Israel’s state apparatus has been captured by figures whom even they would regard as sadistic—and about the degree to which those figures, rather than being fringe, reflect the spirit of Israel itself, including the soldiers, prison guards, police officers, and settlers who carry out their orders.

Sde Teiman, for reference, is the Israeli prison where guards were filmed sodomizing a shackled Palestinian detainee.

Once you’ve spent enough time around settlers and soldiers in the West Bank, you begin to understand that they humiliate Palestinians as a matter of course. A soldier swiping a tray of fresh cookies off the counter of a Hebron cafe; pistol-whipping an elderly shepherd for complaining that a settler had stolen his sheep; strip-searching a woman in a hijab at a checkpoint. These little indignities unfold everywhere you look.

And the impulse to defile has been on full display since October 7. How many IDF soldiers filmed themselves dancing in the underwear of Palestinian women whose homes they’d occupied? What do you think these men would’ve done if those women were around?

Kristof writes that “decades of covering conflict” has taught him that “a combination of dehumanization and impunity” can lead to the type of savagery that often includes sexual violence. So it should come as no surprise that some of the worst abuses are taking place inside Israeli prisons, which effectively became black sites after October 7 when the state barred the Red Cross from visiting “security prisoners” indefinitely, in open defiance of international law.

To be clear, Israeli prisons were never a summer camp. And Israeli forces—whether in Gaza, the West Bank, Arab towns in ‘48, or the prison system—have never been a benevolent force. But under this government, they’ve channeled the id of a racist state more nakedly than ever before, effectively handed carte blanche by political leadership to humiliate and brutalize their “human animal” subjects.

Watch the video below and then ask yourself: Where exactly do you think this man draws the line?

To quote an Israeli MK in defense of raping Palestinian prisoners: “Everything is legitimate.”

On Thursday, Netanyahu announced that he’d instructed his “legal advisers to consider the harshest legal action against the New York Times and Nicholas Kristof”:

One way to fight these supposed “lies” in the court of public opinion would be to abide by international law and allow the Red Cross into the prisons. One has to assume that hasn’t happened for the same reason international journalists are still barred from entering Gaza.

I’ve said for a long time that one of the great failures of the press since October 7 has been its near-total silence on the 10,000+ Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, many without charge, in what Israeli human rights groups have called a “network of torture camps.” This has been the case precisely because the prison system is a perfect distillation of what Zionism looks like in practice: a state apparatus organized around domination, humiliation, and dehumanization. Today, confronting that reality unravels the liberal Zionist fantasy that Israel’s extremists are somehow cordoned off from the rest of society and devoid of significant material influence. Now that a mainstream outlet has finally exposed what’s happening inside these prisons, the country’s defenders are understandably treating it as a grave threat.1

Get 20% off for 1 year

Two additional stories from the past week illustrate how the cruelty of settlers and soldiers that even liberal Zionists can occasionally muster the courage to criticize are not aberrations at all, but expressions of Israeli policy.

Last Friday, a video went viral showing settlers in the occupied West Bank forcing Palestinians at gunpoint to exhume the body of a village elder who had died and been buried earlier that day. In response to the outrage, the IDF released a statement condemning “any attempt to act in a manner that harms public order, the rule of law, and the dignity of the living and the deceased.”

But the settlers, who were accompanied by soldiers, weren’t acting out of random malice. They had come down from Sa-Nur, one of the newly minted northern West Bank settlements, formally reestablished by the government last month, just over twenty years after its evacuation.

In an interview with the Times of Israel, Meir Goldmintz, a “heavily bearded yeshiva teacher,” looked out at the neighboring Palestinian villages from his new home in Sa-Nur and said, “I don’t know why they are here. This is Jewish land.”

According to the government that illegally handed the settlers that land, Goldmintz is exactly right. Who can really blame him for not wanting a cemetery in his new backyard?

Just south of Sa-Nur, near the tiny secular settlement of Shaked, the Israeli Civil Administration—the bureaucratic arm of the occupation now effectively controlled by Bezalel Smotrich—uprooted 3,000 “illegal” Palestinian olive trees to clear space for settlement expansion. (The concept of “illegal trees” is difficult to wrap your head around.) You cannot overstate the cruelty of this—many olive trees in the West Bank are hundreds of years old, with families harvesting them for generations.

But again, it wasn’t random; according to the Times of Israel, “Smotrich said the trees were planted within the boundaries of the zoning masterplan for Shahak [an industrial park near the Shaked settlement] and that removing them would enable the further expansion of the industrial park together with the establishment of a new settlement, in accordance with policies the government has already approved.”

In other words, this move, like the reestablishment of Sa-Nur, is part of the Israeli government’s broader effort to repopulate and entrench Israeli control over the northern occupied West Bank. It’s the same project that was on display last week at the settler real-estate fair held inside Park East Synagogue, where developers marketed homes in Karnei Shomron, another growing settlement in the north. Protesting that, of course, was deemed antisemitic.

Zionism is filled with contradictions, which means that liberal Zionism requires a staggering amount of cognitive dissonance to hold in one’s head. The same mental gymnastics that allow people to condemn Itamar Ben-Gvir while denying his actual influence allow them to divorce these daily acts of cruelty—the exhuming of bodies, the uprooting of trees—from the reality that they’re advancing the central state project of ethnic cleansing, one materially supported in synagogues across the United States.

One final note. Israel’s i24 News reported on Tuesday that the IDF is expected to close the case against the undercover agents who shot and killed four members of the Odeh family—a mother, father, and two of their children, aged seven and five—as they drove home from a Ramadan shopping trip.

The agents who fired the shots were never even questioned.

Subscribe now

Get 20% off for 1 year

Share

Western liberalism is not about the self, but selfishness. Who gets to be a self? Who gets the right to self-defense? This is the central contradiction of liberalism, so much so that it's not really a contradiction, it's just central. 'Israelis' get selves that must be mourned, whereas Palestinians get torture cells and must be bombed. 'Israelis' get to pre-emptively bomb everyone in ‘self-defense’ whereas the natives are terrorists if they dare resist. This is really classical liberalism. Rights for Whites and might for everyone else. They've always been like this. This is not some flaw in liberal democracy. This is working exactly as intended.

John Locke's lofty ideas about the rights of man were limited to the White man, he himself was a slaveholder in the Royal African Company. A self for him, certainly, with rights extending to owning other men. For were these even men? As Montesquieu said, “It is impossible for us to assume that these people are men because if we assumed they were men one would begin to believe that we ourselves were not Christians.” One of the oldest churches is Ethiopian, but since we're taking a selfish view, never mind them. These guys took Greek slave states as inspiration to make slave empires.

Thus John Stuart Mill's liberal ideas did not extend to “those backward states of society in which the race itself may be considered as in its nonage.” This is still why Palestinians are ‘given’ an ‘authority’ and not a state, until they can grow into it. It comes down to the selfsame assumption. The selfish hoarding of human identity in order to go beastmode on everyone else.

This is the central contradiction of liberalism, the Oreo cookie of orientalism. Separating slavery from liberalism is like separating the black and white parts of an Oreo cookie. Why would you do that, except to dunk on it? Putting the contrasts together is precisely the whole thing.

As Samuel Johnson said, “How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty from the drivers of negroes?” Or as Jonathan Boucher said, “the most clamorous advocates for liberty were uniformly the harshest and worst masters of slaves.” In 1778 John Millar said, “Fortune perhaps never produced a situation more calculated to ridicule a liberal hypothesis, or to show how little the conduct of men is at the bottom directed by any philosophical principles.” Because there is no principle at work here. Just selfishness.

As Domenico Losurdo (who I'm cribbing almost all these quotes from) “said in all three liberal revolutions the demand for liberty and justification of the enslavement, as well as the decimation (or destruction), of barbarians, were closely intertwined.” And again, asking why is like asking why Oreos have black and white sides. The tension between black and white is precisely what makes the spring of White Empire wind! As Malachy Postlethwayt said, defending the Royal African Company,

 ‘The Negroe Trade and the natural Consequences resulting from it, may be justly esteemed an inexhaustible Fund of Wealth and Naval Power to this Nation’; they were ‘the first principle and foundation of all the rest, the main spring of the machine which sets every wheel in motion’. The British Empire as a whole was merely ‘a magnificent superstructure’ upon this commerce.

This central contradiction of liberalism is precisely what gave the White Empire energy, ignition, and direction. Remember that Europeans came looking for us, we didn't come looking for them! Europe was a backwater penninsula of Asia, getting precious little sun, and everybody else had more wealth than them. The rest of the world (naturally) had more land and more energy (at that point 100% renewable, mainly solar to grow stuff and labor to pluck it), and Europe desperately wanted in, looking for India in all directions. Thus Europe was driven not to trade (what did that have that we wanted?), as everybody else was doing, but to drive slaves onto land they depopulated. As Montesquieu said,

The peoples of Europe, having exterminated those of America, had to make slaves of those of Africa in order to use them to clear so much land. Sugar would be too expensive if the plant producing it were not cultivated by slaves. Those concerned are black from head to toe, and they have such flat noses that it is almost impossible to feel sorry for them. One cannot get into one’s mind that god, who is a very wise being, should have put a soul, above all a good soul, in a body that was entirely black.

Montesquieu's racism is not coincidental, it's consequential. White Supremacy is the whole play. The color of your skin did matter, it was a physical measure of how much energy you got from the only power source at the time, the sun. Being white was a physical measure of how little energy your people had available. It was literally a broke face. Meanwhile being darker meant you were somewhere where the sun shone, and thus food grew, and supported large populations too. Europeans cunningly turned this material inferiority into ideological superiority. Honestly, well played Whitey, well-played.

Europe exploited solar differentials across the planet to create a great assault battery of planetary proportions. Because the solar battery has been shaken around so much, the physical Whiteness doesn't give you as much of a clue now (brown people can be White now too) but it's still a pretty big clue! The source code of White Empire is White Supremacy, which was not coincidental, it was a highly convenient way of identifying who had skin in the game, and who was to be skinned like game. It told you, at a glance, who had a self and who was beneath them, literally beasts of burden. Hence Locke described such beasts (referring to criminals, but 'Indians' are criminal by default), saying,

And one may destroy a Man who makes War upon him, or has discovered an Enmity to his being, for the same Reason, that he may kill a Woolf or a Lion; because such Men are not under the ties of the Common Law of Reason, have no other Rule, but that of Force and Violence, and so may be treated as Beasts of Prey, those dangerous and noxious Creatures, that will be sure to destroy him, whenever he falls into their Power.

I won't even get to the human supremacy here, but suffice it to say that animal animals got it worse. Anyways, the US Declaration of Independence encoded this Lockism in their Declaration of Independence, saying that George III “endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.” And then they turned it into a practical genocide (remember that every accusation is a confession). As Egerton Ryerson said in this old-ass (1880) book (I'm just going through Losurdo's footnotes),

Yet Congress, by an order which, we believe, has no parallel in the annals of any civilized nation, commands the complete destruction of those people as a nation. It is cruel, indeed, and revolting to humanity, to kill and scalp ever so small a number of ‘individuals, including women and children; but is it less cruel and revolting to render them houseless by thousands, to destroy the fruits of their labours, to exile them from their homes (after having destroyed them), and leave them to nakedness and starvation? Yet such was the case in the execution of the order of Congress for the extermination of the Six Nations.

Do you not see this happening now, is this not the exact logic used for the extermination of men, women, and children in Gaza, and Lebanon, and Iran, and wherever liberal democracy goes? Can you not see, at long last, that the racism is not a bug in this system but rather intrinsic to the system itself? The core of liberal democracy is this selfishness, that some people have selves and the right to infinite offense, and that other people do not, and have no right to self-defense.

Trump's logic for a ‘Gaza Riviera’ is Locke's logic just with stupided words. Locke said “God gave the World to Men in common; but since he gave it them for their Benefit, and the greatest conveniencies of Life they were capable to draw from it, it cannot be supposed he meant it should always remain common and uncultivated. He gave it to the use of the industrious and rational.” This is what Trumps son-outlaw Jared Kushner meant when he said, “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable … if people would focus on building up livelihoods... It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there, but from Israel’s perspective I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up.”

What is he saying here? Nothing crazy really, this is standard liberalism. What Benjamin Franklin said in his autobiography, “if it be the Design of Providence to extirpate these Savages in order to make room for Cultivators of the Earth, it seems not improbable that Rum may be the appointed Means. It has already annihilated all the Tribes who formerly inhabited the Seacoast.” Again and again, these are not anomalies in the liberal project! This is the whole project! See what they did, and also see them still doing it!

Locke's selfish idea of ‘men’ doesn't included colored men or any women, just as Kushner's idea of ‘people’ doesn't include Palestinians. This is by design. Citizenship since the Greeks has always meant in-groups with rights and out-groups ruled by might. If you're White, this is just right. This is just the background logic of White Empire, which goes unnoticed like the white of this page, and bro, I need you to know, they haven't changed.  

The central premise of liberalism is and was not some abstract self but a very real selfishness. Very precious property rights in the imperial core, including the right to make property of people across the globe, and to genocide and assassinate anyone that says no. Very precious speech rights (as long as you say what you're supposed to), which is the casual idea that this or that government should be overthrown, or that these natives are ‘illegal’ and should be thrown out; basically to hate who you're supposed to. Your love of the Empire is not necessary. Your selfishness will do.

Drop Site is reader-funded — no corporate owners, no outside influence. Your support is what keeps this journalism independent and free. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to support our work.

SUPPORT DROP SITE TODAY

Two Iranian women remain in immigration detention, arrested earlier this month on accusations of being the niece and grandniece of Qasem Soleimani, despite no connection to the late Iranian military commander. Drop Site reviewed Iranian birth records, identification papers, a family will, and other personal documents and found no connection whatsoever to him or his extended family. One of the women is now seriously ill in a Texas facility, her chronic blood condition left effectively untreated.

On March 8, right-wing activist Laura Loomer posted on X calling for the deportation of a woman she claimed was Soleimani’s niece. The commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Maj. Gen. Soleimani was assassinated by a U.S. drone strike, ordered by U.S. President Donald Trump, in Baghdad on January 3, 2020. The day after Loomer’s original post, she tagged Secretary of State Marco Rubio on X, claiming to have reported the woman to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for “posting content sympathetic to the Iranian regime and Ayatollah.”

On April 3, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her daughter, Sarina Hosseiny, were taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at their home outside Los Angeles. Rubio issued a statement headlined, “Secretary Rubio Revokes Green Cards of Foreign Nationals with Ties to Iranian Terror Regime,” identifying them as “the niece and grand niece of deceased Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Major General Qasem Soleimani” and describing them as “green card holders living lavishly in the United States.”

The claims made headline news in the U.S., while triggering immediate denials from Soleimani’s family that the two women were relatives of the military commander. The Trump administration has gone largely quiet about the women’s cases since their arrest, as they remain in ICE detention pending deportation to Iran.

As attention has faded, the situation for the women has turned dire at the South Texas ICE Processing Center in San Antonio, particularly for Hamideh, 47, who lives with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, which requires regular treatment and blood transfusions she isn’t getting.

Subscribe now

As a student in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Hamideh was active in protest movements in Iran, and, she says, even spent a week in prison after getting arrested at one demonstration. Sarina, in a phone interview from the ICE facility where they are being held, said that her mother—not one to hold back her opinions—was most looking forward to having “freedom of speech” when she moved here to the United States. She remains opposed to the son of the former Shah, Reza Pahlavi, as well as Trump’s current war. “She’s kind of a passionate person overall, and she thought that she was going to come here and be able to talk freely when she’s been threatened and imprisoned in Iran for speaking about politics, and now she’s again in prison for speaking out about politics,” she told Drop Site.

They were forced to leave Iran under duress after Sarina took part in a dance performance on vacation in Turkey at the age of 12. The dance competition was filmed and later aired by the satellite channel “TV Persia” and her dance went viral. (Two of her performances are still viewable on YouTube.) The channel is illegal in Iran but many residents have access to it. She said she was expelled from her public school, only to enroll in a private school and later to be expelled from that one, too, when the scandal recirculated. Some of her more conservative family members, who had connections to the government, beat and threatened her mother, Hosseiny said, and the situation became increasingly unbearable. At 14, she came to the United States on a student visa and the two of them applied for asylum.

In terms of its alignment with how the United States professes to see its place in the world, and the claims it makes about Iran’s treatment of women and girls, it’s hard to think of an asylum claim that would more neatly fit into the American agenda.

Sarina translated for her mother, who added that she doesn’t know where to turn if the U.S. isn’t safe either. “We came to America to seek calm and to feel safe and protected from that regime,” Hamideh said, according to her daughter’s translation. “And now we’re being treated almost the same—even worse than there. We’ve been here for three weeks now. I don’t know where to go from here.”

Sarina, 25, has also spoken with friends outside the detention facility, conveying that her mother has been denied the treatment she needs, is regularly in and out of consciousness, with dangerously low hemoglobin levels. Her mother recently passed out and was left unconscious on the floor for over ten minutes, Sarina reported to her friend Shawna Ruhland.

“She’s basically just trapped in there watching her mom die,” Ruhland said of Sarina. Ruhland, who served for eight years in the U.S. military, has set up a GoFundMe to help cover the family’s legal bill, which Drop Site verified is legitimate. (Update: GoFundMe had not yet approved the fundraiser, so she started a different on here.)

The South Texas ICE Processing Center, where the women are being held, declined to provide information on them other than to confirm they were in custody; their attorney, Sam Faragalla, did not respond to requests for comment.

Both were legal permanent residents until Rubio revoked their legal status. A State Department spokesperson, in an odd statement, said the government stood by its determination. “While we do not comment on matters of classified intelligence, we remain certain of the Secretary’s determination,” said Assistant Secretary Dylan Johnson. “If ‘Drop Site News’ is aware of anti-American green card holders with ties to terrorists presently in the United States, we would gladly investigate those individuals for possible termination of legal status and deportation.”

A review of personal documentation undercuts the allegation of a personal connection to Soleimani. Birth certificates from Iran, collected by the family, lay out a documented family tree spanning multiple generations with no connection to Qassem Soleimani, or even to relatives of the late general. Drop Site also reviewed other personal identification documents, including passports, family photographs, and work documentation from both Iran and the U.S. that strongly contradict the allegations that the two women were connected to the late Iranian military commander, or living lavishly from any connection to the Iranian government.

In order for Qasem Soleimani to be Hamideh’s uncle, based on her last name, he would need to be the brother of Hamideh’s father, Ali Soleimani-Afshar, who was born in Tehran in 1947. Yet according to the documents, Soleimani-Afshar had no brothers at all and his father died in the early 50s. Gen. Soleimani was born years later—in 1957—in a small village in the southern province of Kerman. Ali Soleimani-Afshar’s parents died in his childhood. Historical passport documents also show that Soleimani-Afshar’s family origins go back generations to the city of Yazd in central Iran, a province away from the roots of Gen. Soleimani.

The late general is also known to have two brothers, Sohrab and Hossein, who have previously given interviews about their upbringing in rural Kerman that identify themselves as his only brothers and make no mention of a connection to Ali Soleimani-Afshar.

Qassem Soleimani’s own family in Iran issued numerous strident denials that they had any relation to the late general. Soleimani’s youngest daughter, Zeinab Soleimani, a well-known political figure inside Iran, said in Iranian media that the State Department’s allegations were “false” and that “the individuals arrested in the United States have no connection whatsoever to our family.” Another daughter, Narjes Soleimani, went further in a separate statement, adding that, “To this day, no member of the Soleimani family, nor any relative of General Soleimani, has resided in the United States.”

To be clear, even if the women were in fact distantly related to Soleimani, such a link would not, under any version of justice, make them guilty of anything. While the U.S. says spouses and children of alleged terrorists can be detained, the law deems arresting other relatives inadmissible. The U.S. recently took immigration action against leading Emory University cancer researcher Dr. Fatemeh Ardeshir-Larijani, simply for being the daughter of Ali Larijani, a top Iranian official and Kantian scholar assassinated by the U.S. and Israel in March, along with his son. She was out of the country at the time her legal permanent resident status was stripped and barred from re-entering. Emory fired her.

In the wake of their detention, the State Department said that the asylum claim filed by the two Los Angeles women was undercut by the fact that they had visited Iran in subsequent years.

In general, a grant of asylum is indeed called into question if the asylum seeker travels back to the country where they have claimed they are unsafe, immigration lawyers say. Hosseiny said that because they are not political dissidents wanted by the government, but rather a girl and her mother who had pushed the boundaries of gender politics in a repressive environment, they deemed the trips home safe enough. She said that she had informed the government about the trip and there was no objection until they were arrested years later. “They’re about to lose everything that they’ve built here, because no one’s willing to help,” said Demi Uredi, a friend of Sarina, who is figuring out how to pay the mortgage for their house or sell it entirely.

Patrick Taurel, an immigration attorney at Grossman Young & Hammond, questioned the merits of the arrest. “Based on what I have seen firsthand as an immigration lawyer… I would not be surprised if the recent targeting of Iranians is based on shoddy and unreliable evidence,” he said. “That was true in the Mahmoud Khalil case and the cases of the other Palestinian dissidents; that was true with my client, Reginald Boulos; and that could well be true here. Congress must rein in this power.”

Sarina’s friends also disputed characterizations by the State Department that the family had been living lavishly in the United States, pointing out that they had been behind on mortgage payments and that they had been relying on the support of friends to pay for legal support in ICE detention. The jewelry and handbags flaunted on Instagram and highlighted by the U.S. government were, like much else in North Hollywood, entirely fake, her friends said.

“They’re not blood money, like regime trust fund kids, none of this is true whatsoever,” said Uredi.

In the meantime, Sarina’s mother is at severe risk. “The only thing that they can do is a blood transfusion with a match, because she has a severe anemia,” said Uredi. “And Sarina might be a match, but they’re like, we don’t even have the equipment here to do this for you. And that was two weeks ago, and now this week, they’re like, Yeah, we still don’t have the equipment. They just put her on antibiotics. That’s not going to save her life.”

Loomer, reached for comment, was unmoved, insisting the women were indeed related, but that it didn’t matter either way. “I want all Islamic immigrants deported. I don’t support any of their asylum claims,” she said.

Areeba Fatima contributed reporting.

Leave a comment

Share

The extraordinary story you’re about to read, by Camila Lourdes Galarza, is a dark look into what it’s like to live and die on the other side of U.S. headlines. As we expand deeper into reporting on South and Central America, particularly with the hiring of our Latin America bureau chief José Luis Granados Ceja, this is the kind of journalism we hope to be bringing you more of. (Granados Ceja just returned from a reporting trip to Cuba; watch him discuss the situation there on Breaking Points.)

This expansion has been made possible by a surge in reader support over the past six months or so, and if you want to see more of this, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or make a one-time or recurring contribution. Reporting like this isn’t cheap, but the world is far poorer if it doesn’t exist. If you do upgrade, please put a note in there that you’d like to see more Latin America reporting.

QUITO, Ecuador—The last time Roxanna Mero heard from her husband Carlos was January 19. Calling from sea on an emergency line, he said an “American aircraft, two drones, and a blue patrol ship” had been circling La Fiorella, the Ecuadorian fishing boat he captained. The presence of an airplane worried him, given that Trump’s extrajudicial airstrikes across the Pacific and Caribbean have killed more than 170 people in 6 months, but a local coast guard had already inspected the vessel, found nothing and cleared them to continue.

The next day, the boat went up in smoke. The eight fishermen aboard have not been seen since.

Three independent accounts from relatives of the missing crew assert that eyewitnesses, on a nearby raft at the time of the incident, saw La Fiorella engulfed in flames. “They’ve been threatened not to speak to the press. They’re scared for their lives,” said Angelica Lourdes Mero, whose son and spouse are among the disappeared men.

Subscribe now

Ninety days after La Fiorella vanished, Roxanna told Drop Site News, “No search team has been sent out. In Manta, we live with constant military helicopters circling overhead every hour but none of them have been used to find my husband.” The helicopters are part of ongoing US-Ecuadorian joint operations, despite 60% of Ecuadorians voting to uphold the constitutional ban on foreign military presence in their territories this past November. The ban was originally introduced in 2007, precisely due to the U.S. military sinking fishing boats off the coast of Manta.

Under right-wing president Daniel Noboa, Ecuador has become a critical U.S. proxy in the region; described as a “North American colony” by political analyst and former advisor to Ecuador’s Secretary of International Relations Daniel Granja.

The military regime, which rules by martial law, has stonewalled all inquiries into the whereabouts of the fishermen. “They slammed the door in our face,” Angelica Mero told Drop Site News.

The United Nations Committee on Forced Disappearances, which was already investigating Noboa’s armed forces prior to this incident, has issued a letter demanding answers on La Fiorella. Opposition lawmaker Mónica Palacios echoed those calls, announcing she will bring this case directly to the U.N.

Now, 36 survivors of two Pacific attacks fitting a similar profile alleged that they were abducted and tortured by American forces and taken by boat all the way to El Salvador before being returned to Ecuador. Drop Site spoke to multiple survivors and attorneys from both boats.

Drop Site reached out to the U.S. Southern Command for comment on all three incidents; they said they had no information to provide and directed questions to Ecuador. Drop Site asked Ecuador’s Port Authority for comment. They hung up after hearing the call was from journalists.

“Filled the floor of our lifeboat with blood”

On March 23, 16 Ecuadorian fishermen from a second vessel, La Negra Francisca Duarte II, were found by El Salvador’s coast guard, their limbs mangled and backs etched with burns. One man’s foot was spliced open, exposing bone. Another had lesions on the nape of his neck that left him dizzy whenever he moved.

The fishermen told Drop Site News they’d been struck by a drone with a yellow cylinder five days earlier, forced to jump overboard to escape the fire caused by the explosion, and subsequently taken captive by forces on a U.S.-flagged blue patrol ship—just like the one Roxanna Mero’s husband, Carlos Valencia Mero, had described before he disappeared. Captain Hernán Flores, one of the 16 survivors, said the word “Spear” was written on the hull of the blue ship. Trump’s counternarcotics military program in the Americas is named Operation Southern Spear.

“A lot of us had wounds all over our bodies from the explosion. One young man was bleeding so much he filled the floor of our lifeboat with blood,” said Flores. “The drone had flown through our cabin window, torn my nephew’s foot so bad you could see flesh and bone, and made the boat’s roof cave-in on the back of my neck. A few seconds later, an explosion shook the boat causing a terrible ringing in our ears. Out of exasperation, the guys threw themselves into the water, some without life jackets, even the ones who don’t know how to swim.”

As the fishermen made their way toward what they hoped was safety on the nearby blue boat, an aircraft hovered directly overhead. Nearing closer, they spotted blonde-haired men, armed to the teeth, dressed in camouflage uniforms, and yelling “hands-up” in English. Flores said they began to pray, convinced they were going to die.

Guns drawn, the men placed hoods over the fishermens’ heads, handcuffed them, and held them on the blue ship’s scorching metal deck for over 24 hours, blistering their skin. The Ecuadorian crew of La Negra Francisca Duarte II were surprised to find themselves detained following the attack. Like Mero’s husband, they had been cleared to proceed by Ecuadorian coast guard personnel just hours earlier at a checkpoint near the Galápagos.

The gunmen, issuing instructions through an interpreter, offered no explanation for why they were being apprehended, nor did they bother to inquire what had happened, as a rescue team might, or search their boat for evidence, as a counternarcotics operation would. All but one fisherman were denied medical attention, despite the severity of what they had just endured. Held for days, they were refused food and given only one bottle of water.

La Negra Francisca Duarte II burning on March 17, 2026, captured by nephew of Captain Hernan Flores and provided to Drop Site News.

The following day, despite being in Ecuadorian waters near the Galapagos Islands, the kidnappers transported the fishermen roughly 900 nautical miles north, turning them over to El Salvador’s coast guard.

Drop Site News spoke to 11 associates across El Salvador’s Ministry of Defense, coast guard, and navy, all of whom said they were aware of the incident but were unauthorized to comment. In recent years, El Salvador’s government has drawn scrutiny from human rights advocates over President Nayib Bukele’s embrace of U.S. President Donald Trump’s migration policies, labeling him an accomplice to U.S. human rights violations, with several documented cases of torture in its prisons—facilities the Trump administration has contracted to hold deported migrants. On March 24, El Salvador’s authorities began coordinating the return of the fishermen to Ecuador.

“Just like the Americans didn’t do anything to help save us when our boat was bombed, the Ecuadorian government also hasn’t done anything to help us,” Flores told Drop Site. “It was our families who made sure we got home safe.”

“El pueblo salva al pueblo,” he said, a popular Spanish saying about solidarity and mutual support between working-class people.

Ecuador’s Foreign Minister, Gabriela Sommerfeld, cast doubt on the innocence of the fishermen and defended the extrajudicial assault. “Ecuador and North America are working cooperatively with joint activities. I cannot tell you for sure what activities the fishermen were carrying out or the situations they are in,” Sommerfeld told local media.

Throughout her tenure, Sommerfeld has repeatedly come under fire for failing to uphold international law. Most notably, when Ecuador stormed the Mexican embassy to kidnap former Vice President Jorge Glas of left-wing party Revolución Ciudadana, ending diplomatic ties between the two nations for the first time since they were established in 1838. An event that Tamara Lajtman, researcher with the Lawfare Observatory and the Institute for Latin American & Caribbean Studies, said was the foreshadowing for an autocracy rife with abuses, “It revealed a willingness to use state force outside of any legal limits. It’s really not an isolated incident, but rather a symptom of an authoritarian way of exercising power.”

Legal counsel for La Negra Francisca, Jorge Chiriboga, frames the airstrike as a similar breach of international law. “This is an invasion of Ecuador’s airspace and maritime because it occurred within Ecuador’s Insular Exclusive Economic Zone,” Chiriboga told Drop Site. Chiriboga, shared GPS photos with Drop Site News taken at the site of the bombing showing La Negra Francisca was operating within permitted limits.

“These attacks are no longer just a mistake,” he continued. It is a planned and coordinated abuse against working-class civilian fishermen who are unarmed and they should be condemned by international law. Imagine these bombs would’ve killed all of them, it is an extrajudicial action by a foreign nation, it’s an abuse by the biggest force in the world.”

“They treated us like animals”

The second report of torture came two weeks later. On April 3rd, 20 more Ecuadorian fishermen aboard the Don Maca were intercepted by El Salvador’s coast guard. Arriving with vision and hearing loss, bruised limbs, and perforated arms, they reported a strikingly similar account of an alleged attack by U.S. soldiers: a bombarded boat, a round of bullets, and no due process.

This time, the men charged that they had been held hostage and hooded for eight days.

“They treated us like animals,” said Sebastián Palacios of the Don Maca vessel, his thousand-yard stare welling with tears as he embraced his family at the Manta airport upon finally returning to Ecuador weeks later.

Several workers of both the Don Maca and La Negra Francisca remain hospitalized; many are receiving psychiatric care, as well.

The attorney for the Don Maca crew, Pilar Muñoz, recounted her clients’ testimonies to Drop Site News.

“Two small drones and one big drone had been tailing them for 24 hours,” she said. “They informed Don Maca’s owner, Cristian Mendoza, of the sighting, and he assured them not to worry, as the boat and fishermen had all the proper licensing and registration. He told them, ‘There’s no problem since you’re just there to fish.’”

“But the next day,” Muñoz continued, “a drone struck their boat, causing an explosion just 15 centimeters from the gas tank. Had it hit any closer, they would’ve all died from the explosion, and there would’ve been no survivors to tell this story.”

Immediately, the crew scrambled to raise a white flag, signaling they were unarmed and in distress. Men in uniforms on an adjacent boat—who the survivors of Don Maca also identified as U.S. military—followed with multiple rounds of glass pellet gunfire, leaving crew member Erik Coello with 70% vision loss and his arms riddled with puncture wounds and embedded glass. They eventually ceased and instructed them to approach their boat.

The fishermen said the kidnappers were white, spoke English, and accompanied by a translator with an Ecuadorian dialect.

A survivor, who asked not to be named due to pending legal action, told Drop Site News that, once detained on the boat, he was fired on again with a pellet gun. The account resembled what Coello had experienced, though by then the men had been hooded and were unable to see what exactly was being done to them.

Just before men in fatigues forced hoods over their heads, the fishermen caught a glimpse of them doubling back to bomb and sink their already damaged boat.

“If the boat would’ve actually been carrying drugs, they wouldn’t have drowned the boat because they would’ve needed to use it as proof,” Muñoz pointed out.

Ecuador’s interior minister, for example, released video of a different detained vessel around the same time that was found carrying 300 packages of cocaine 180 nautical miles off the coast of Manta. In the video, officials are seen carefully locating, documenting, and preserving the evidence with no signs of a drone strike. Unlike Don Maca or La Negra Francisca’s fishermen, the alleged traffickers aboard the vessel were returned to Ecuador the same day, alive and without apparent serious injuries— paraded in front of TV outlets as a victory lap for the Ecuadorian government.

Noboa’s Unconstitutional War

While no drugs or illicit behavior were found on any of the three boats, the same cannot be said for ships belonging to the family and private enterprises of Ecuador’s right-wing president, Daniel Noboa.

In 2025, Colombian investigative journal, Revista Raya, revealed that €26 million worth of cocaine headed for Croatia had been seized by Ecuadorian authorities from the shipping containers of Noboa Trading. Leaked chats showed Balkan drug traffickers bragging that they had exclusive access to Noboa Trading ports and containers.

An employee of Noboa Trading, Jose Luis Rivera, responsible for inspecting the ports for narcotics, has been arrested by Ecuadorian officials four times in connection to drug trafficking. Noboa’s personal attorney, who he later appointed Minister of Health, served as the legal representation for Rivera. Rivera’s charges were dismissed after Ecuador’s attorney general decided not to pursue charges. In March the head of Ecuador’s notorious cartel, Los Tiguerones, told Spanish newspaper El Mundo that President Noboa struck a deal with the group to whip votes for his election in exchange for immunity, contradicting his primary campaign pledge to combat drug trafficking and corruption.

The Miami-born billionaire was elected president of Ecuador only after the assassination of his political rival, Fernando Villavicencio; American mercenary group, Blackwater, patrolled voting sites on election day. Noboa has since built a military regime, backed by the U.S. through Pentagon-supplied bombs, and enforced using a never-ending decree that the country is in a state of war. The FBI even opened its first office on Ecuadorian soil under the pretext of fighting drug trafficking. A UN probe determined there was insufficient legal basis for Noboa’s state of war decree.

Tamara Lajtman, researcher at the Lawfare Observatory, calls it “the consolidation of an authoritarian project with strong elements of militarization and geopolitical alignment with the United States.” “Ecuador is being reconfigured as a strategic enclave in the hemispheric security architecture of the United States, especially in that strategic competition with China,” Lajtman continued. “We’re seeing raids, judicial proceedings, actions in the electoral arena, public stigmatization.”

All the while, drug trafficking has soared under Noboa’s presidency, now accounting for 70% of the world’s cocaine distribution.

The spectacle of “combatting drug trafficking” while actually targeting civilians is reminiscent of Colombia’s 2006 “Falsos Positivos” scandal wherein U.S.-funded armies massacred an estimated 6,000 disabled men, luring them to remote areas under the false promise of a job, then slaughtering and dressing them in guerrilla uniforms to meet wartime quotas.

In March, the New York Times published an investigation that found campesinos, in the indigenous and oil-rich Sucumbíos region of the Amazon, had been kidnapped, waterboarded, electrocuted, and bombed during a joint operation by the Ecuadorian military and U.S. Southern Command. Using U.S. intelligence, the operation had supposedly identified a FARC dissident drug camp. However, the New York Times, and several local journalists, found no proof of a drug camp—only a farm whose workers were left with severe physical and psychological trauma.

A few months prior, 16 Ecuadorian soldiers were convicted for the kidnapping and burning to death of 4 Afro-Ecuadorian children as young as 11 years old. The military tried to justify the atrocity by wrongfully accusing them of drug trafficking.

As executive power continues to be unconstitutionally consolidated in Ecuador, through the banning of political opposition parties, the rescheduling of elections, the kidnapping of democratically elected officials, and the assasination of indigenous workers on strike, a sense that the country has slid into autocracy now prevails. As former president of Ecuador’s National Assembly and the leader of Noboa’s largest political opposition party, Gabriel Rivadeneira, said, “Ecuador is living under dictatorship. Whoever raises their voice to defend the rights of their people either has their life threatened, their house raided, or is sent to jail.”

Leave a comment

Share

Correction, April 21, 2026: Noboa’s personal attorney is the former Minister of Health, not the current minister. The mistake was due to an editing error.